Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jule Niemeier Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Niemeier analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jule Niemeier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Niemeier
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 46.95% of points on their second serve, while Niemeier has won 44.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 56.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Niemeier has won 58.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.66% and 41.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 65.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niemeier has saved 53.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 13), with Niemeier winning 54.93% (W/L 39/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13). Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 126/ 65), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 32/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibert winning 1 times and Niemeier being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gibert winning 2 and Niemeier winning 1. The last match between Gibert and Niemeier was at the Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg, 25-06-2024, Second, Grass with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Niemeier have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gibert winning 1 times and Niemeier 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 0, and Niemeier 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 220 while Niemeier has played against players with an average rank of 212.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niemeier has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niemeier has converted 48.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
113
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
96
Rank
61
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
64% (349-197)
Career Total W/L
60% (205-139)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
60% (31-21)
$5,095,525
Career Prize Money
$1,106,480
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jule Niemeier For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibert VS Niemeier
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jule Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:40 | 1:52:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (41/78) | 44% (35/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (33/41) | 80% (28/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (17/37) | 32% (14/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (37/79) | 36% (28/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jule Niemeier
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jule Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 60% (31/21) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (32/29) | 59% (73/51) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (291/276) | 53% (604/532) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 65% (13/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 60% (12/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 38% (3/5) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 97 | 146 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0.58 |
| DFs Total | 126 | 318 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:16 | 1:45:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.56 | 192.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1145/1933) | 55% (2097/3816) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (759/1145) | 65% (1363/2097) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (370/788) | 45% (767/1719) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (93/202) | 48% (236/491) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (778/1832) | 47% (1779/3767) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 40% (2/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 56% (10/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 60% (31/52) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 67% (8/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 45% (9/20) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (10/6) | 83% (35/29) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (10/4) | 17% (35/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 47% (15/7) | 12% (17/2) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jule Niemeier
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Arantxa Rus
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jule Niemeier
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Maria Sakkari
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
110)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Jule Niemeier
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
10
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Jule Niemeier
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Clara Tauson
54%
(
54 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Jule Niemeier
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Celine Naef
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jule Niemeier
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
0-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Dalma Galfi
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Niemeier Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Niemeier photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jule Niemeier
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
